What Would Rachaeli's Parents Do
As physicians, the last thing Rachaeli's parents wanted to consider was
to sue another physician. However, at the time of diagnosis, one is so
confused and shocked they have to ask themselves, "How could this have
happened?" If you fit into one of the high risk groups, you naturally
feel personal guilt for not having been more meticulous when providing
your medical history and cultural background to your doctor. You may
also feel anger, as if you've been wronged, as if someone did this to
you out of negligence. Even if you live on an elevated spiritual plane
and are able to see your child's new fate as part of a much bigger
picture, your pain and heartache inevitably bring you back down to
earth, where you want to fight for your child and what she, and you,
have to endure. Even if you know in your heart that there is a reason
for this and everything else in this world, and that no one is able to
fully comprehend the mysteries of life, you still need to look for
answers so that no stone is left unturned, so that you can feel
confident that you did everything possible for your child.
Rachaeli's father was tested for Tay-Sachs, for the presence of the
enzyme Hex A in his blood, about 8 years before Rachaeli was born. The
results were read as "non-carrier." Rachaeli's mother was not tested,
believing that
not being an Ashkenazi Jew put her risk at zero.
Rachaeli's paternal aunt was a known Tay-Sachs carrier, so they were
aware the recessive gene was in the family, but given the other data,
they were quite confident that their children were not at risk for the
disease.
In their situation, the laboratory reading, or the cut-off enzyme level
the lab made between carrier and non-carrier, was inaccurate. Even so,
Rachaeli's father's reading was just one or two percentage points
outside of the carrier range. Knowledge that his sister was a known
carrier and that his Hex A levels were almost in the carrier range,
should have prompted a re-test for the enzyme level or a chromosomal
analysis for one of the genetic mutations causing Tay-Sachs. This was
not done. If there was negligence, it weighed more heavily on the
laboratory as their reference range for a carrier was much lower
(required a much lower level of enzyme activity) than the range other
labs used. Using another lab, Rachaeli's father would have been
identified as a carrier 8 years before her birth.
Rachaeli's parents were informed of a legal situation termed "wrongful
life", or "wrongful birth". In their case, it did not apply because the state in which they were
tested, Pennsylvania, did not recognize or allow wrongful life law
suits. In another state, it would have qualified. The term
"wrongful birth" will be described and discussed on the page entitled, What is Wrongful Life.
Rachaeli is now7-1/2. Do her parents wish they could have settled a law
suit? Possibly. It was a straight-forward case that most likely would
have settled out of court. At the time, they did not pursue it any
further.
Now, at 7-1/2, they realize how much some extra money could help them
better take care of their daughter. She's a big girl, the length of a
normal 7-year-old, but much heavier-feeling because she fluctuates
between flopping and stiffening up when you carry her. Her mother has
yearned for a motorized chair lift for the stairs, which would allow her
to put Rachaeli on her lap and be "driven" down the stairs. Instead,
she typically keeps her in her tiny, second story room because the
burden of lugging her up and down the stairs is so great; she has pulled
out her back and shoulder a few times already.
Her mother covets many different types of disability equipment: a hoist
and ceiling track to transport her from bedroom to bath; a bath chair
that rises to waist level to avoid the deep bend required to take her
out of the tub; a wheelchair ramp over the front steps of the house,
which would make taking a walk outside a pleasure and not the burden it
can be; an RV for travel, so they could pack in all of her equipment,
allow her to lie down while driving, and bypass the need to move
everything into and out of hotel rooms (her parents usually take
individual trips with her brothers and the other stays home with her);
and the list goes on.
One reason for not investing in any of these disability extravagances is
the cost; they just don't have extra money, especially since her mother
stopped working 5 years ago. The other is the uncertainty that she
will be with them in another day, week, or month. She has well
surpassed her life-expectancy. Is it worth investing in such expensive
equipment? If they had known she would be here as long as she has, they
would have made obtaining these items a priority years ago. Had there
been a settlement, finances would not have been an issue and Rachaeli
would now have all equipment a severely medically fragile, (almost)
8-year-old child would need.
Return to Top